Hosea the Book

The prophet Hosea is said to be a native of the northern kingdom who prophesied in the time of Jeroboam II (who reigned until 747 B.C.E.) and continued into the reign of Israel’s last king, also named Hosea. The prophet appears not to have seen the fall of Israel in 722. Hosea is one of the most difficult prophetic books—the text is quite corrupt, and at times the Hebrew is simply unintelligible. Chapters 1 to 3 tell of the prophet’s marriage to a promiscuous woman as a metaphor for Yahweh’s relationship with Israel. Chapters 4 to 14 contain an indictment of, or lawsuit against, Israel and comment on the political and religious affairs of Israel. In this chapter, we focus on Hosea 1–4. The historical background for the book is the Assyrian threat. In the eighth century B.C.E., the Assyrians were wiping out the smaller states of the ancient Near East, and Israel could not be far behind.

Elizabeth Hayes, Christine. Introduction to the Bible (The Open Yale Courses Series) (p. 263). Yale University Press. Kindle Edition.

Chapter 3 contains Hosea’s first-person account of Yahweh’s command to him to marry an adulteress. The adulteress symbolizes Israel, taken from a life of connection with multiple gods, brought into a marriage contract that requires her to remain faithful to one party in contrast to her customary behavior.

Elizabeth Hayes, Christine. Introduction to the Bible (The Open Yale Courses Series) (p. 266). Yale University Press. Kindle Edition.

Below is the ChatGPT summary of a Hosea portion of Yale Professor Christine Hayes’ “Lecture 17. Literary Prophecy: Hosea and Isaiah”. Her transcript was uploaded to ChatGPT and the prompt asked for a summary.

The lecture focuses on the eighth-century northern prophet Hosea, a linguistically difficult book set against the backdrop of the expansionist Assyrian Empire. Hosea’s marriage symbolizes Israel’s relationship with God and serves to remind Israel of God’s forbearance and Israel’s obligations and pledge to loyalty under the covenant at Sinai.

OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT [Large language model]. https://chatgpt.com

The lecture by Professor Christine Hayes explores the themes and structures of the books of Hosea and Isaiah, key prophetic texts in the Hebrew Bible.

Hosea
  1. Historical Context:
    • Hosea, a northern prophet, addresses Israel during the Assyrian threat in the 8th century BCE.
    • His prophecies span the reigns from Jeroboam II to the last king, Hosea.
  2. Major Themes:
    • Covenant: Hosea critiques Israel for breaking the covenant with God through foreign alliances and idolatry.
    • Metaphors of Betrayal: Hosea uses his marriage to Gomer, a promiscuous woman, as a metaphor for Israel’s unfaithfulness to God.
    • Doom and Hope: Though Hosea portrays a grim picture of Israel’s fate, he offers a vision of redemption, emphasizing God’s steadfast love and eventual reconciliation.
  3. Structure:
    • Chapters 1–3 focus on Hosea’s marriage as a symbol of God’s relationship with Israel.
    • Chapters 4–14 contain oracles, indictments, and calls for repentance.
  4. Impact of Covenant Theologies:
    • Hosea juxtaposes the conditional Mosaic Covenant (requiring obedience) with the unconditional covenants (with the patriarchs and David), underscoring both judgment and ultimate restoration.
Comparison
  • Commonalities: Both prophets highlight covenantal faithfulness, social justice, and the consequences of sin, while offering hope of redemption.
  • Differences: Hosea focuses on Israel’s infidelity to the Mosaic Covenant, while Isaiah emphasizes the Davidic Covenant and Zion theology.

This lecture underscores the dynamic interplay between judgment and hope in prophetic literature, reflecting Israel’s theological evolution amidst historical crises.

In Hosea, the prophet’s family life is used as a metaphor for God’s relationship with Israel. Hosea is commanded by God to marry a promiscuous woman, Gomer, symbolizing Israel’s unfaithfulness to Yahweh. Their marriage and children serve as a vivid depiction of divine judgment and hope for reconciliation.

Hosea’s Wife: Gomer
  1. Character and Symbolism:
    • Gomer’s unfaithfulness represents Israel’s idolatry and covenantal betrayal.
    • Her relationship with Hosea mirrors the spiritual adultery of Israel turning to Baal worship and foreign alliances.
  2. Divorce:
    • In Chapter 2, Hosea declares God’s divorce from Israel: “She is not my wife, and I am not her husband” (Hosea 2:4), a formal declaration in ancient Israelite terms.
    • Despite the rupture, the chapter oscillates between God’s anger and longing for reconciliation, expressing His steadfast love and hope for Israel’s return to faithfulness.
Hosea’s Children: Symbolic Names and Context

Hosea and Gomer have three children whose names convey divine messages of judgment and redemption:

  1. Jezreel (Hosea 1:4):
    • Meaning: “God will sow.”
    • Context: Named to symbolize God’s punishment of Jehu’s bloodshed at Jezreel, highlighting the consequences of unjust violence and unfaithfulness.
    • Dual Significance: Later, Jezreel becomes a symbol of hope, indicating God’s restoration and replanting of Israel.
  2. Lo-Ruhamah (Hosea 1:6):
    • Meaning: “Not pitied” or “No mercy.”
    • Context: Indicates God’s withdrawal of mercy and forgiveness from Israel due to persistent disobedience and covenant violations.
  3. Lo-Ammi (Hosea 1:9):
    • Meaning: “Not my people.”
    • Context: Signifies God’s rejection of Israel as His covenant people, symbolizing a severed relationship.
Redemption and Reconciliation

Despite the grim symbolism, Hosea also offers a vision of restoration:

  • God’s steadfast love triumphs, and the children’s names are reinterpreted positively (Hosea 2:25):
    • Jezreel: A fertile land where God will “sow” blessings.
    • Lo-Ruhamah: Restored to favor and mercy.
    • Lo-Ammi: Reclaimed as God’s people.

Hosea’s family story, with its painful ruptures and hopeful reconciliations, dramatizes the tension between God’s justice and mercy. It underscores the prophet’s central message: while Israel must face consequences for infidelity, God’s covenantal love remains unbreakable.

From the transcript in Dropbox of Christine Hayes’ lecture “Introduction to the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible)”, RLST 145 at Duke University.

  • Lecture 16 – Literary Prophecy: Amos, Chapter 1. – “…you have prophets of the Assyrian crisis. This is when the two kingdoms still exist. In the north prophesying in Israel, you have Amos and Hosea. And in the south you have Isaiah and Micah. So think of those four books together. It will be easier to note the differences among them if you group them together.“
  • Lecture 17 – Hosea is considered by many to be the most difficult of the prophetic books. The Hebrew is very difficult and it sometimes seems rather garbled. It’s very hard to render it intelligibly. But structurally, we can divide the book into two main sections. Chapters 1 to 3 have a certain coherence to them, and then chapters 4 through 14.
    • 1 to 3 tells of the prophet’s marriage to a promiscuous woman named Gomer.
      • The first chapter is reported in the third person. And this contains God’s command to Hosea to marry a promiscuous woman as a symbol of God’s own marriage with a faithless wife, Israel. “Go, get yourself a wife of whoredom and children of whoredom; for the land will stray from following the Lord.” (1:2)
      • Chapter 2 – ...between chapter 1 and chapter 3, both of which have the accounts of these relationships that are metaphors for God and Israel’s relationship — sandwiched between them is the almost schizophrenic chapter 2. It contains, again, this sustained violent, very violent account of the faithless wife, of faithless Israel and God’s formal declaration of divorce.
      • Chapter 3 contains a first person (Hosea’s first-person) account of God’s command to him. There it’s said that God commands him to befriend, although he seems to hire, a woman on condition that she not consort with others.
    • chapters 4 through 14 contain oracles primarily, oracles against the nations but also against the Kingdom of Israel.
    • Hosea 1:7 goes so far as to suggest that actually the moment of decision has past for the northern kingdom. There’s still some hope for the southern kingdom, but the northern kingdom has obviously made its choice and it was the wrong choice. Hosea says that God says, “…I will no longer accept the house of Israel or pardon them. (But I will accept the House of Judah. And I will give them victory through the Lord their God;” — a victory through the Lord their God. “I will not give them victory with bow and sword and battle, by horses and riders.” If you think that’s what gives you victory you’re mistaken. Some see that verse as perhaps a later interpolation into Hosea; it has such a positive assessment of the southern kingdom.
    • But there is this sense of impending disaster that resonates throughout the Book of Hosea. Chapter 8:7, “They sow wind, / And they shall reap whirlwind — / Standing stalks devoid of ears / And yielding no flour. / If they do yield any, Strangers shall devour it. / Israel is bewildered;” So the catastrophe is unavoidable, and Hosea’s often been described as painting a portrait of unrelieved gloom. He’s very grim. He seems to hold out no real hope for Israel. She has to pay the price for her infidelity to God.
    • And [Hayes} think the one overarching theme that helps us organize most of the material in the Book of Hosea, and one that shows its deep indebtedness to or interconnectedness with the Book of Deuteronomy, is the theme of covenant, particularly Deuteronomy’s notion of covenant. So I put covenant at the top there and we see this theme being played out in several different ways.
      • The first I’ve just discussed: as Yahweh’s covenant partner — as the vassal of the covenant partner, Yahweh, the sovereign — Israel should be placing her confidence entirely in Yahweh.
      • A second way in which the theme of covenant is expressed is found in Hosea’s denunciation of social injustice and moral decay, and of course this is a theme that’s common to the prophets. Here he follows Amos. But he’s now the first to couch his charge in the form of this formal riv, or lawsuit, in which God is said to bring a charge against Israel for violating the terms of the covenant, for breach of covenant. This happens in chapter 4, the first three verses of chapter 4 — Israel is charged. And Hosea employs language that deliberately invokes the Decalogue:
      • As Israel’s covenant partner God loves Israel and he actually longs for her faithfulness. This steadfast covenantal love — one of the words that’s used repeatedly is hesed, but it refers to a special kind of steadfast love, loyal love — this covenantal love will reconcile God to wayward Israel just as Hosea is reunited or reconciled with his faithless wife.
    • So Hosea isn’t unrelievedly gloomy and grim. It does provide these images, these very stirring images of hope and consolation and reconciliation. Amos also held out hope in the form of a remnant that would survive the inevitable destruction. So we need to think about the two traditions that prophets like Amos and Hosea are drawing on in this combined message of doom on the one hand, and hope on the other.

El, Elohim and YHWH use in Hosea

Yes—critical Bible scholars generally agree that Hosea 11:9 in the Masoretic Text uses ’ēl (אֵל) and not ’ĕlōhîm (אֱלֹהִים) or YHWH (יהוה).

Here’s the Hebrew (MT):

כִּ֣י אֵ֤ל אָנֹכִי֙ וְלֹ֣א אִ֔ישׁ בְּקִרְבְּךָ֖ קָד֣וֹשׁ וְלֹ֣א אָב֑וֹא בְּעִֽיר׃

Transliteration: kî ’ēl ’ānōkî wĕlō’ ’îš bĕqirbĕkā qādôš wĕlō’ ’ābô’ bĕ‘îr.

Literal: “For I am El and not man, the Holy One in your midst, and I will not come in wrath.”

What scholars say about this wording

  • Francis Andersen and David Noel Freedman (Hosea, Anchor Bible, 1980, p. 579–580): note that the word here is clearly אֵל, pointing to the old, archaic divine name, not Elohim. They stress that Hosea often uses El in poetic and archaizing ways.
  • Hans Walter Wolff (Hosea, Hermeneia, 1974, p. 199): also reads this as El, not Elohim or YHWH. He points out that Hosea deliberately contrasts El (“God in divine majesty”) with ’îš (“a man”).
  • Ehud Ben Zvi (Hosea, FOTL, 2005, p. 256): agrees the Hebrew has El, emphasizing the parallelism: “I am El and not man.” He argues the text intends to heighten the contrast between divine otherness and human limitation.
  • James Luther Mays (Hosea, OTL, 1969, p. 155): notes that Hosea uses El instead of YHWH here, likely because the poetic line required the shorter form, and because the contrast El ≠ man makes sense rhetorically.
  • Hebrew Bible textual tradition:
    • The Dead Sea Scrolls (4Q78, 4Q82) preserve Hosea 11:9 and also read El (אֵל), confirming the Masoretic reading.
    • The Septuagint (LXX) renders it with θεός (“God”), which is the expected translation of El.

Summary

Critical scholars agree that Hosea 11:9 uses אֵל (El), not Elohim or YHWH. It is original Hebrew, supported by both the Masoretic Text and the Dead Sea Scrolls, and translated as theos in the Septuagint. The choice of El here is usually explained as poetic and rhetorical, contrasting God with humanity: “For I am El and not a man.”

Would you like me to also trace where else in Hosea El (not Elohim or YHWH) occurs, to see if this is a consistent usage pattern in the book? A: YES.

Good — let’s track this carefully. Hosea actually uses אֵל (’ēl) in a few strategic places, but overwhelmingly uses YHWH.

1. Hosea 11:9

We already covered this one:
כִּי אֵל אָנֹכִי וְלֹא אִישׁ
“For I am El and not a man.”

Here, “El” is deliberate — contrasting divine with human.

2. Hosea 12:4–5 (English vv. 3–4)

בַּבֶּטֶן עָקַב אֶת־אָחִיו וּבְאוֹנוֹ שָׂרָה אֶת־אֱלֹהִים
“In the womb he took his brother by the heel, and in his strength he strove with Elohim.”

Then:
וַיָּשַׂר אֶל־מַלְאָךְ וַיֻּכָל בָּכָה וַיִּתְחַנֶּן־לוֹ בֵּית־אֵל יִמְצָאֶנּוּ וְשָׁם יְדַבֵּר עִמָּנוּ
“He strove with the angel and prevailed, he wept and sought his favor; at Bethel (house of El) he met him, and there he spoke with us.”

→ Here, El appears in the place-name Bethel (house of El). Hosea highlights the Jacob tradition with “El” as the divine name.

3. Hosea 12:10 (Eng. v. 9)

וְאָנֹכִי יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרַיִם עוֹד אוֹשִׁיבְךָ בָּאֳהָלִים כִּימֵי מוֹעֵד
Here it’s YHWH your Elohim, not El. But in the same section (Hos 12:3–6), Hosea mixes El, Elohim, and YHWH to recall the old patriarch stories.

4. Hosea 13:4

וְאָנֹכִי יְהוָה אֱלֹהֶיךָ מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם וֵאלֹהִים זוּלָתִי לֹא תֵדָע וּמוֹשִׁיעַ אַיִן בִּלְתִּי
Here, Hosea explicitly uses YHWH and Elohim. No El here.

5. Hosea 14:9 (Eng. v. 8)

אֶפְרַיִם מַה־לִּי עוֹד לָעֲצַבִּים אֲנִי עָנִיתִי וַאֲשׁוּרֶנּוּ אֲנִי כִּבְרוֹשׁ רַעֲנָן מִמֶּנִּי פֶּרְיֶךָ נִמְצָא
No El here either, but scholars note this is almost a divine self-declaration, similar in tone to Hos 11:9.

Summary of Usage in Hosea
  • El (אֵל):
    • Hosea 11:9 (“I am El and not man”)
    • Hosea 12:5, in Bethel (“house of El”)
  • Elohim (אֱלֹהִים):
    • Hosea 12:4, 13:4, multiple other places
  • YHWH (יהוה):
    • Dominant in Hosea (appearing ~40 times)
Scholarly Observations
  • Andersen & Freedman (Anchor Bible Hosea, p. 580–582): Hosea seems to preserve archaic divine language. El is older and poetic, evoking patriarchal and northern traditions (Jacob at Bethel, El as the Canaanite high god).
  • Hans Walter Wolff (Hermeneia Hosea, p. 199–200): The rare use of El may reflect deliberate rhetorical choices — Hosea contrasts El with “man” in 11:9 and invokes Jacob’s encounter with “El” in ch. 12.
  • Mark S. Smith (The Early History of God, 2nd ed., 2002, p. 32–34): Hosea’s occasional use of El suggests memory of the older Israelite religion where El and YHWH were identified but not yet entirely collapsed into one.

So:

  • Hosea mostly says YHWH, often with Elohim.
  • He uses El only in key, charged spots (11:9, 12:5/Bethel).
  • Critical scholars agree these uses are deliberate archaisms, linking to older Israelite religion and patriarchal traditions.

Do you want me to map every instance of “El” (אֵל) across all the Twelve Minor Prophets to see if Hosea is unique in this selective use? The response of YES led to another long Response that ended concisely with:

Conclusion

Scholars agree these rare El usages preserve older religious language and carry poetic, archaic weight — Hosea 11:9 is the most theologically striking example.

Hosea, Micah, and Nahum stand out in using El explicitly.

Other prophets (Joel, Amos, Zechariah, Malachi, etc.) overwhelmingly prefer YHWH or Elohim.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Related Posts: